Trad Gang

Main Boards => PowWow => Topic started by: Over&Under on August 02, 2007, 11:32:00 AM

Title: Simmons Shark 190's - Question???
Post by: Over&Under on August 02, 2007, 11:32:00 AM
Can someone tell me what these would weigh W/O bleeders - around 175 grns?????


Thanks

Jake
Title: Re: Simmons Shark 190's - Question???
Post by: Tim Fishell on August 02, 2007, 11:38:00 AM
Jake, I think they weigh 190 with out the bleeders.  I have some 160 Landsharks and they weigh 160 with out the bleeders installed.
Title: Re: Simmons Shark 190's - Question???
Post by: Hawkeye on August 02, 2007, 11:42:00 AM
Also, glue on Sharks are 160 gr, I believe, but don't accept bleeders.  Still if you are looking for something a bit lighter, it would be an option.

Daryl
Title: Re: Simmons Shark 190's - Question???
Post by: beachbowhunter on August 02, 2007, 12:13:00 PM
The Interceptor 190s without bleeders are actually heavier and can run over 200 grains. The TreeSharks were the same. Don't know why they do that.
Title: Re: Simmons Shark 190's - Question???
Post by: Over&Under on August 02, 2007, 12:20:00 PM
Thanks guys - I am tuned for 175 grains up front, and that weight in a broadhead is hard to find.  I will probably end up going to a 50 grn insert and use any number of 125 grain heads... Just thought that it would be nice to find a good 175 grain head...Know of any??????

Jake
Title: Re: Simmons Shark 190's - Question???
Post by: James Wrenn on August 02, 2007, 12:53:00 PM
The 135gn Tigershark on an aluminum adapter gets you as close as possible to 175gn broadhead.
Title: Re: Simmons Shark 190's - Question???
Post by: Gary Logsdon on August 02, 2007, 12:57:00 PM
I've used the 190 gr.Interceptor for years.  On my grain scale they run approx. 195-200 grains w/o bleeders
Title: Re: Simmons Shark 190's - Question???
Post by: Over&Under on August 02, 2007, 01:16:00 PM
Good to know Gary - As Beachbowhunter said, don't know why they do that.

Jim - Thanks, I might have to give that combo a try.

Jake