Trad Gang

Main Boards => PowWow => Topic started by: **DONOTDELETE** on June 21, 2007, 12:05:00 PM

Title: Are Carbons faster?
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on June 21, 2007, 12:05:00 PM
I haven't chrono'd the carbons I just made up. I was wondering if it is my imagination or do these fly faster than a comparable aluminum or wood? They sure seem to.....? What is your experience?
Title: Re: Are Carbons faster?
Post by: Patience on June 21, 2007, 12:07:00 PM
lighter and thinner, physics would dictate that they should.
Title: Re: Are Carbons faster?
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on June 21, 2007, 12:08:00 PM
I guess I should have added that I am not a speed junkie (need to say this in case there are some trad. police lurking out there). lol   But I was a little surprised at the difference when I first shot them. I still love making and shooting wood arrows. My Legacy's hit the mark consistantly....I love 'em all.
Title: Re: Are Carbons faster?
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on June 21, 2007, 12:09:00 PM
I like your handle! I could use more of that at times.
Title: Re: Are Carbons faster?
Post by: jonesy on June 21, 2007, 01:37:00 PM
No imagination there, they fly faster and last longer, but nothin hits like wood.
Title: Re: Are Carbons faster?
Post by: doctorbrady on June 21, 2007, 01:44:00 PM
I believe that arrow speed is simply related to the weight of the arrow if all other things are equal.  Two well tuned arrows of the same weight should fly the same whether wood, aluminum, or carbon.
Title: Re: Are Carbons faster?
Post by: Charlie Lamb on June 21, 2007, 02:05:00 PM
In theory, the carbon should be faster all else being equal... less energy wasted in paradox.
Title: Re: Are Carbons faster?
Post by: Orion on June 21, 2007, 02:22:00 PM
What Doc and Charlie said.  Your carbons are probably lighter than the wood and aluminum you've been shooting.
Title: Re: Are Carbons faster?
Post by: Kingstaken on June 21, 2007, 04:15:00 PM
LOL,,,In Theory?..LOL
Title: Re: Are Carbons faster?
Post by: doctorbrady on June 21, 2007, 04:24:00 PM
Charlie,
Thank goodness I am only a single doc...not a paradox.  I hate wasted energy.
Title: Re: Are Carbons faster?
Post by: Diamond Paul on June 21, 2007, 06:41:00 PM
Simple physics: if your bow shoots them faster, they must be lighter than what you have been shooting, although they may tune better out of your bow, and, as Charlie said, be straightening out quicker and wasting less energy, thus giving you more speed.
Title: Re: Are Carbons faster?
Post by: **DONOTDELETE** on June 21, 2007, 06:54:00 PM
Makes sense.
Good one Doc!
Title: Re: Are Carbons faster?
Post by: Patience on June 21, 2007, 07:05:00 PM
Snag1, I could use more myself, that is why I chose it. When I think of shooting trad it just stood out, along with a couple others but it just seem to fit.
Title: Re: Are Carbons faster?
Post by: Bill Kissner on June 21, 2007, 09:02:00 PM
Charlie is right on the money with this. A carbon weighing the same will be noticably faster because of its quicker recovery from paradox.
Title: Re: Are Carbons faster?
Post by: TXRED on June 21, 2007, 10:11:00 PM
Have you seen the slow-mo video on the Carbon Express website?Nothing short of amazing to me,& leaves little doubt(to me,anyhow) as to why a carbon should be faster.