Trad Gang

Main Boards => PowWow => Topic started by: jdupre on February 09, 2007, 10:50:00 PM

Title: Thoughts on Hill-style quiver
Post by: jdupre on February 09, 2007, 10:50:00 PM
I was just looking at some of the pictures of Hill's quiver in a couple of books I have and noticed how really flexible his quivers were. They were almost like a loose sack as opposed to the fairly thick and rigid quivers that are the norm now. Has anyone tried a thinner and more flexible quiver and how did you like it?

Joey
Title: Re: Thoughts on Hill-style quiver
Post by: mongo45 on February 09, 2007, 11:11:00 PM
I use a Howard Hill back quiver from Howard Hill Archery.  i don't think a better back quiver exists.  the quiver conforms to my back and the arrows don't fall out when i bend over to pick up the arrow i missed with. I pick up alot of missed arrows.
tm
Title: Re: Thoughts on Hill-style quiver
Post by: jdupre on February 09, 2007, 11:39:00 PM
Yeah, bending over to pick up an arrow that missed the target AND having your arrows fall out too is NOT cool.LOL
Title: Re: Thoughts on Hill-style quiver
Post by: DesertDude on February 10, 2007, 02:31:00 AM
take a look at the quivers I make in my post.  6/7 leather seams to be the right fit for a back quiver.  remember to keep it oiled and it will soften up........Mark
Title: Re: Thoughts on Hill-style quiver
Post by: Stone Knife on February 10, 2007, 05:16:00 AM
I have a hunter quiver that is made by Mike G. He is listed on this site in the trad gang sponsors list under mike's archery leather. My quiver is flexible I have never had an arrow fall out when bending over even in heavy brush.


  (http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y275/420W/IM000347.jpg)
Title: Re: Thoughts on Hill-style quiver
Post by: jdupre on February 10, 2007, 10:12:00 AM
Yeah, Stone Knife, that seems more like the old Hill quivers- flexible enough to conform to your back. Thanks for the response.

Joey
Title: Re: Thoughts on Hill-style quiver
Post by: Charlie Lamb on February 10, 2007, 10:43:00 AM
Consider the stage of his career that Hill was in. I'll bet that the pictures of him in the real "baggy" type quivers were from his youth.

As his tastes and experience evolved he moved to slightly stiffer quivers which pressed lightly against his back and the arrows without "snagging" on his barbed broadheads...his favorite heads were barbed until the advent of his last commercial offering.

I've got a mid sixties, machine stitched, Hill back quiver that is soft enough to collapse around the arrows but firm enough to hold it's shape. Same quiver that Hill had been using.
Title: Re: Thoughts on Hill-style quiver
Post by: Nate Steen . on February 10, 2007, 12:54:00 PM
Right-0 Charlie,

Hill's early quivers were quite soft, for the quietness sake, but many were too soft, and he had to attach a dowel to the outside to keep it from collapsing too much.  In the 50's and later, he went to a slightly stiffer leather, probably about 6 oz. or so, which solved the problem.  On his laced quivers, he just laced a stiff piece of sole leather to the bottom and that kept the bottom from collapsing too much.  With the machine stitched quivers, HH Archery put a stiffer piece of leather around the bottom to keep the leather from collapsing.....Swinehart used this kind of quiver, and yours is probably the same kind.
Title: Re: Thoughts on Hill-style quiver
Post by: Charlie Lamb on February 10, 2007, 05:27:00 PM
Exactly Nate! I need to get a picture of that quiver and show everybody what a REAL Hill quiver looked like.  ;)  

Even thought about getting a friend of mine in the saddle business to make one just like it for me... I retired mine years ago to save wear and tear.