Trad Gang

Main Boards => Trad History/Collecting => Topic started by: Chuck_Delsandro on December 30, 2009, 09:51:00 AM

Title: Why not an Alaskan?
Post by: Chuck_Delsandro on December 30, 2009, 09:51:00 AM
I recently bought a "69" Alaskan 45@28 62". It performs very well and will make a great hunting bow. I wonder why they arn't more popular or more valuable??? Opinions please!

Chuck
Title: Re: Why not an Alaskan?
Post by: Kevin L. on December 30, 2009, 10:29:00 AM
I have a '58 Alaskan dual shelf that shoots great. I know other bows are popular, but the Alaskans and Polars are good shooters, at least what I can gather from mine. Hope to find some other Bears this year, especially a '58 and '59 Kodiak.

Kevin
Title: Re: Why not an Alaskan?
Post by: blind one on December 30, 2009, 12:04:00 PM
My sons bow is a 69' Alaskan. Its 62" 25@28. I play with it every now and then. It shoots great. If it was heavier I would use it......Roy
Title: Re: Why not an Alaskan?
Post by: PaPaFrank on December 30, 2009, 12:31:00 PM
I loved the '59 Alaskan I owned. It was a great shooter, just a little light, but I hunted with it often... (http://i258.photobucket.com/albums/hh270/FJSchultz/January200959Alaskan004-1.jpg)... (http://i258.photobucket.com/albums/hh270/FJSchultz/January200959Alaskan003.jpg)
Title: Re: Why not an Alaskan?
Post by: Kevin L. on December 30, 2009, 12:41:00 PM
Beautiful bow Frank. BTW, I'm loving the Polar. You've got me hooked, now I'm checking that auction site every day looking for more.

Take care Bud!

Kevin
Title: Re: Why not an Alaskan?
Post by: Chuck_Delsandro on December 30, 2009, 01:02:00 PM
I can see where the white limbs could be an issue to some, but limb covers work nice!

I may have to take mine on hunt before the season is over here in PA.

Frank thanks for the photos. I'll get some of my Alaskan soon!
Title: Re: Why not an Alaskan?
Post by: jcar315 on December 30, 2009, 05:47:00 PM
I have quite a few of the dual shelf Alaskans and I really like them alot. The black and orange glass is very cool looking and they shoot great.

How popular a specific old Bear bow is can change quite a bit from time to time. I picked mine up from TG members and a few off **** too. But only when the price was right!
Title: Re: Why not an Alaskan?
Post by: Chuck_Delsandro on December 30, 2009, 07:04:00 PM
I will also be keeping an eye out for these now. Sorry bout the competetion:)
Title: Re: Why not an Alaskan?
Post by: machomanandysavage on December 30, 2009, 11:45:00 PM
I have 2 dual shelf Alaskans and really like them. I know they made them, but it seems hard to find them in the 55# range.

One thing I noticed is that my green one stacks a lot more at my 30" draw than the black and orange one, which is smooth all the way out.
Title: Re: Why not an Alaskan?
Post by: Horney Toad on December 31, 2009, 12:00:00 PM
I have seen 1969 Alaskans with zebrawood and they were nice looking bows.

The only problem I have with these bows is they do not have laminated tips. If you have a 1969 Alaskan that you want to use a lot, I'd laminate the tips.
Title: Re: Why not an Alaskan?
Post by: BobT on January 01, 2010, 09:19:00 AM
I have a '58 Alaskan that I got from Jeremy, it's a great shooter too. It's a little heavy for me at 58# but I can shoot it better than most of the other '58s in my collection. The extra weight helps clean up my sloppy release!
Title: Re: Why not an Alaskan?
Post by: Kevin L. on January 01, 2010, 10:54:00 AM
Bob,
Let me know if you'd like to swap out that 58#er. Mine's 45# and I have a heck of a time getting a clean release.

Kevin
Title: Re: Why not an Alaskan?
Post by: Rick P on January 02, 2010, 01:42:00 AM
I'll definitely be adding a "Alaskan" and a "Polar" to my collection. The 67 "Polar" is a beautiful bow and what Alaskans Bear bow collection would be complete without a "Alaskan"?

Chuck
No reason to complain about white glass when you have snow 6 months a year.
Title: Re: Why not an Alaskan?
Post by: Chuck_Delsandro on January 02, 2010, 08:03:00 AM
Good Point Rick!
Title: Re: Why not an Alaskan?
Post by: BobT on January 03, 2010, 03:55:00 PM
Kevin,
I typed 58 too many times I guess, Mine is actually a 56# draw weight. I will let you know if I decide to part with it.

Bob
Title: Re: Why not an Alaskan?
Post by: Jack Shanks on January 05, 2010, 07:01:00 PM
Picked up three old Bears today from a fellow. One is dual shelf Alaskan orange on the belly and black on the back. From reading this post I'm guessing 1959? It's a light weight version at only 26# but a nice looker non the less.
Title: Re: Why not an Alaskan?
Post by: Jeremy on January 06, 2010, 08:16:00 AM
QuoteOriginally posted by BobT:
Mine is actually a 56# draw weight
I'm glad you're still shooting that one!  It's one heck of a nice bow and if it weren't so heavy at my 30" draw it'd still be on my rack  :)