Trad Gang

Main Boards => Trad History/Collecting => Topic started by: Horney Toad on August 14, 2008, 12:03:00 AM

Title: 1964 Mag
Post by: Horney Toad on August 14, 2008, 12:03:00 AM
260273941246 Looks like a nice mag. Wish it were a lefty.
Title: Re: 1964 Mag
Post by: Earl E. Nov...mber on August 14, 2008, 07:06:00 AM
Thanks, I'll have to keep an eye on it,, I have been looking for a bow for the blind.
Title: Re: 1964 Mag
Post by: PAPALAPIN on August 14, 2008, 08:13:00 AM
HORNY TOAD

Check out his '61 lefty

120293180502
Title: Re: 1964 Mag
Post by: d. ward on August 14, 2008, 08:29:00 AM
Here is one I picked up for 75 bucks a couple years ago.It had two holes on the coin side for a quickie quiver and one in the fiberglass just below the riser overlays.This one is 42# and will be delivered to the grandson for his 12th birthday this saturday...But what I wanted to mention is 1962 1964 & 1965 mags are (I think) the best shooters of all the mags.This one at 42# is a real nail driver at around 20 yards or so with the correct arrow spine and weight.They are short range bows and work just super for blinds and short shots from a tree stand.Good luck with the bidding hope you can snag it cheeeeeeeepishly.bowdoc... (http://i264.photobucket.com/albums/ii175/bowdocsarchery/64001.jpg)
Title: Re: 1964 Mag
Post by: PAPALAPIN on August 14, 2008, 12:51:00 PM
Doc

We all know the inherent problems with the '63 Dogleg K-Mags, as far as the types I & II.  

My Type III shoots pretty good.  

What is your opinion of how this model stands up to the '62, '64, & '65?
Title: Re: 1964 Mag
Post by: raghorn on August 14, 2008, 02:36:00 PM
Horney Toad:
PM to you
Title: Re: 1964 Mag
Post by: d. ward on August 14, 2008, 03:26:00 PM
Oh yeah Jack all three 63's shot very good as well.....bowdoc